Pengaruh Kemampuan dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Anggota DPRD Kota Banjarmasin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35130/jrimk.v2i1.35Keywords:
Ability, Motivation, PerformanceAbstract
The good performance of the legislature in this autonomy era is a necessity and necessity so that the institution can carry out its duties, authority and rights accountably, be more responsive and reliable. Good performance is certainly influenced by ability, leadership and work motivation and discipline of the board members themselves. On the basis of these reasons the authors are interested in discussing and knowing how the Effect of Ability and Motivation on the Performance of Banjarmasin City DPRD Members. This study aims to be able to describe the and motivation dominant influence on the performance of Banjarmasin City DPRD Members.
The analytical tool used ability, work motivation and performance, then analyze the influence of work ability and motivation on the performance of Banjarmasin City DPRD Members then analyze the influence of the dominant variables between work ability in this study is to use used validity and reliability testing tools for the data, reliability testing was carried out by Cronbach Alpha test. To find out the influence between Ability (X1), Motivation (X2) and Performance (Y), simultaneous regression analysis methods are used as follows: Ability Test Results (X1), Motivation (X2) on Performance (Y) simultaneously on DPRD Members Banjarmasin. The analysis used is Linear Regression and tested using a distribution table.
Based on the results of the research results, it can be stated that simultaneously it is known that for Ability t count = 2.914 *> t (45; 0.05) = 1.679 is significant and for Motivation t count = 0.944ns <t (45; 0.05) = 1.679 which means that work ability has a significant effect on the performance of Banjarmasin City DPRD members, while non-significant work motivation means ability and motivation can affect performance even though there are motivational variables that cannot influence the performance of Banjarmasin City DPRD members. Work ability is the variable that has the dominant influence on the performance of Banjarmasin City DPRD members, because based on the results of the ability test, motivation on performance simultaneously on members of Banjarmasin City DPRD, it is known that the ability variable has the most dominant influence, compared to the motivation variable.References
Arikunto. 2006. Instrumen Penelitian. Jakarta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2003, Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta , PT. Rineka Cipta.
Danang Sunyoto, 2013, Perilaku Organisasional (Teori, Kuesioner dan Proses Analisis Data), CAPS (Center of Academic Publising Service), Yogyakarta.
Darma, Jufri. 2012. Pengaruh Pengetahuan Anggota Dewan tentang Anggaran terhadap Pengawasan Keuangan Daerah dengan Partisipasi Masyarakat sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jurnal Mediasi, Vol. 4 , Juni 2012.
Gibson, James I. 1989, Manajemen dan Perilaku Keorganisasian, dalam http:// gilangdawous.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/jadi-buku.docx.
Gitosudarmo, Indriyo & Sudita, I Nyoman (2000), Perilaku Keorganisasian, Edisi 1, Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Gregory Moorhead dan Ricky W. Griffin, 2010, Perilaku Organisasi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dan Organisasi edisi 9, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Guritno, Bambang dan Waridin. 2005. Pengaruh Persepsi Karyawan Mengenai Perilaku Kepemimpinan, Kepuasan Kerja Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja. JRBI.Vol 1. No 1.
Hersey dan Blanchard, 1993.Teori Situasional Kepemimpinan,Manajemen perilaku organisasi memanfaatkan manusia sumber daya (8th. ed.). Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Labay, Ilyas, Sujianto dan Zulkarnain. 2012, Kompetensi Pengetahuan, keterampilan, Motivasi Kerja dan Kinerja Anggota DPRD Provinsi Riau.
Malayu S.P. Hasibuan, 2013, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (edisi Revisi), Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Merdeka Malang, Universitas. 2014. Pedoman Penulisan dan Ujian Tesis, Program Pasca Sarjana Univeritas Merdeka Malang. Malang.
Moh As’ad. 2003. Psikologi Industri. Yogyakarta: Libery.
Nenny Anggraeni, Pengaruh Kemampuan dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Sekolah Tinggi Seni Indonesia Bandung,ISSN 1412-565X.
Prabu Mangkunegaran, Anwar. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Prabu Mangkunegaran, Anwar, 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja. Bandung : Refika.
Riduan, 2009, Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian, Alfabeta, Bandung.
Rivai, Veithzal dan Basri. 2005. Performance Appraisal: Sistem Yang Tepat Untuk Menilai Kinerja Karyawan Dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan. Rajagrafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Sanusi, Anwar. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis disertai contoh Proposal Penelitian Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi dan Manajemen. Penerbit Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
S. Ruky, Achmad. 2004. Sistem Manajemen Kinerja (Performonce Management System). PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Sedarmayanti, 2014.Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia , Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen PNS. PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Simamora, Henry, 1997. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Kedua.STIE : YKPN
Sisworini dalam Gibson, James L et al 2006. @Organization (Behavior, Struktur, Processes)”. Twelfth Edition, McGrow Hill.
Sulistiyani, Ambar T. dan Rosidah. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Graha Ilmu: Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono. 1999. Metode Deskriptif. Jakarta.
Tika, P. 2006. Budaya Organisasi Dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan. PT Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Trihendradi, C. 2013. Step by Step IBM SPSS 21 : Analisis Data Statistik. Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.
Wirawan, 2009, Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia, Teori , Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
Wirawan, 2013, Kepemimpinan, Teori, Psikologi,Perilaku Organisasi, Aplikasi dan Penelitian, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
http://wahyutriwalodi.blogspot.com/2012/05/Teori Motivasi-kinerja.html, diunduh pada tanggal 26 Nopember2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








